List of UNDP publications

relevant for Serbia

Records found: 11

Regional Human Development Report on Social Inclusion 2010

Date of issue: Forthcoming in 2010

The Regional Human Development Report on Social Inclusion for the Europe and CIS countries will examine social exclusion, both as processes and outcomes, in the region around four different types of exclusions that people in the region can experience: Exclusion from economic, social, cultural and political life of the society where they live.

In the new HDR, we envisage developing a conceptual and methodological framework for better linking poverty and exclusion, which will be applied in Kazakhstan, FYROM Macedonia, Moldova, Serbia, Tajikistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan. The report should be an original effort to expand, or bridge, the measurement of poverty and social inclusion with our capabilities based human development paradigm. 

 


 

The project

The methodology and outline

Stakeholder consultation process

Events

Team

 


 

The Project

The overall objective of the project "Regional Human Development Report on Social Inclusion" in Europe and CIS (hereinafter "RHDR") is to operationalise the powerfull social exclusion concept into a practical policy-making tool for addressing social exclusion that can be applied throughout the region.

The RHDR will consist of a regional report and 7 individual country studies that are being drafted by regional and country teams. The country studies cover Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Ukraine, Moldova, Serbia and FYROM Macedonia. A quantitative survey will be designed to provide necessary input data for the proposed social exclusion indicators (outcomes and drivers). These will complement existing data as evidence for formulating answers to the regional report’s key research questions:

  1. Who are the excluded in terms of economic, social, cultural and political exclusion in the different countries or types of countries of the region? What patterns emerge in terms of typology of groups and countries?
  2. How are they excluded? What are the levels and dynamics of exclusion and multiplying effect from one domain on to another?
  3. Why are they excluded? Which barriers do groups and individuals face? What role do institutions and policies play in generating exclusion? In post-socialist countries specifically, how is social exclusion related to the dynamic interaction between legacies and transition policies?
  4. What are the implications of these exclusions in terms of outcomes in other domains, for human development, for social cohesion, etc.?
  5. What needs to be done? What strategies are needed to overcome these barriers?

More information about the project can be found in the Project document.

 


 

The methodology and outline

The RHDR will provide countries with an analytical and monitoring indicators framework that will illustrate typologies of exclusion patterns and practices (the status/outcome and magnitude of social exclusion) and related drivers (multi-dimensional factors contributing to the status of being excluded). This framework will help understand the specific patterns of exclusion in countries with transition experience, will shed light on their pre-transitional roots and will offer a basis for future evidence-based inclusive policy design and monitoring.

The report sets the ambitious goal of building an indicators framework that can help identify causal links and, on this basis, provide policy-makers with specific policy recommendations and priorities in the area of social inclusion. This makes the role of data crucial in the research. The data component is designed to provide inputs for (1) estimating the magnitude of exclusion in individual dimensions, (2) identifying the important correlations between determinants and outcomes taking into account also the broader historical context, (3) estimating the risks of exclusion, as well as (4) suggesting tools and mechanisms for assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of inclusion policies. For the purpose of the report, a special sample survey will be conducted.

The survey's objective is to fill current data gaps and provide quantitative and comparable data on social exclusion in the participating countries. It will address social exclusion as a phenomenon resulting from inequalities in terms of access to economic resources, education and employment opportunities, access to and quality of social services, social networks, and political, cultural and civic participation. Instead of defining “excluded groups” and sampling them individually during the survey, larger representative samples will be interviewed (2,700 individuals per country) to identify various types and magnitude of exclusion drivers. A polling agency carries out the survey in all participating countries using a common questionnaire and the same sampling methodology. 

More details about the methodology can be found in the Outline and methodological note.

 


 

Stakeholder consultation process

These consultations have five aims: (a) hear stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences relating to the theme, (b) consider the broad contours identified, sharpen and guide the direction and scope on specific issues, (c) provide validation for the particular position that the RHDR is to take, (d) promote buy-in and capacity building among the stakeholders, and, (e) initiate early advocacy.

Consultation with stakeholders takes place at various levels:

  • National consultations related to the country studies and regional report in participating countries

Participants include government officials, researchers, academicians, CSOs, the media and UN country offices. These will be organised by the national research teams in the participating countries.

  • National consultations related to the regional report in non-participating countries

All countries of the Europe and CIS region are regularly informed and consulted on the progress of the report elaboration. The RHDR progress will be presented at regional meetings, such as RRs/DRRs meetings. Substantive consultations will be carried out via the regional Human Development Community of Practice (HD CoP) in a facilitated way.

  • Regional and international consultations related to the regional report

Regional stakeholder consultations help in sharpening the focus of the regional report. Participants include regional think tanks, universities, regional CSOs, regional agencies and organisations. Substantive regional stakeholder consultations will be carried out in a facilitated way by sub-themes at various stages of the report elaboration. 

 


 

Events

 

PAST EVENTS

  • Inception workshop for the Regional team, 06-07 May 2009, UNDP Bratislava Regional Center

Brief summary of the key results

RHDR powerpoint presentation (prepared by the Team leader Ms. Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh)

 

  • Inception workshop for the country teams, 09-10 June 2009, Istanbul

Brief summary of the key results

Template for country studies

 


 

TEAM
                          

Project Coordination             

Regional Team          Advisory Board

Country Teams         Project Board  

 

 

PROJECT COORDINATION

Susanne Milcher, Project Manager and Social Inclusion Specialist

Jaroslav Kling, Project Coordinator

Andrey Ivanov, Human Development Advisor

Michaela Matichova, Project Assistant

   

 
Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh, Writing Team Leader
 
Matthijs N. Spoor, Chapter author
Paul Stubbs, Chapter author 
Tatjana Peric, Chapter author
Branka Andjelkovic, Chapter author
 
Dotcho Mihailov, Survey expert
Sevinc Rende, Indicator expert
 
 
 
 
Kazakhstan   
Janar Jandosova
Macedonia    
Miroslav Shukarov
Maja Gerovska- Mitev
Petar Atanasov 
Jovan Ananiev 
Moldova        
Viorica Craievschi 
Maria Vremis
Dorin Vaculovschi
Varvara Buzilă
Petru Bogatu
Serbia            
Slobodan Cvejic
Marija Babovic
Gazela Pudar
Tajikistan      
Rustam Bobojonov
Ukraine         
Ella Libanova
Olena Makarova
Yuriy Levenets
Victor Kotygorenko
Uzbekistan    
Kakhramon Yusupov
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADVISORY BOARD

Gordon Alexander, UNICEF

Petra Hoelscher, UNICEF

Marie Laberge, Oslo Governance Center

Joachim Nahem, Oslo Governance Center

Anuradha Rajivan, RBAP

Tim Scott, HDRO

Paola Pagliani, HDRO

Martina Lubyova, ILO

Esther Forgan, DFID

Teresa Durand, DFID

Simon Narbeth, DFID

Kori Udovicki, RBEC

Cihan Sultanoglu, RBEC

Moises Venancio, RBEC

Louisa Vinton, RBEC

Parviz Fartash, RBEC

Mahmood Ayub, RBEC

Ben Slay, BRC

Dafina Gercheva, BRC

Adriana Dinu, BRC

Andrey Ivanov, BRC

Annie Demirjian, BRC

Koh Miyaoi, BRC

Luis Francisco Thais, BRC

Shombi Sharp, BRC

Lovita Ramguttee, UNDP Moldova

Kibriyo Jumaeva, UNDP Tajikistan

Bakhyt Abdildina, UNDP Kazakhstan

Ainur Baimyrza, UNDP Kazakhstan

Aferdita Haxhijaha Imeri, UNDP Macedonia

Katerina Rybalchenko, UNDP Ukraine

Danilo Vukovic, UNDP Serbia

Daniel Varga, UNDP Serbia

Elena Danilova, UNDP Uzbekistan

Ziyodullo Parpiev, UNDP Uzbekistan

Nicolas Jarraud, UNDP Cyprus

 

 

 

 

 
Jens Wandel, Deputy Regional Director & Bratislava Regional Centre Director
Balazs Horvath, Poverty Reduction Practice Leader, BRC
Matilda Dimovska, DRR Moldova
Sukhrob Khoshmukhamedov, ARR Tajikistan
Steliana Nedera, DRR Kazakhstan
Ilaria Carnevali, ARR Ukraine
Ann-Marie Ali, DRR Macedonia
Rini Reza, DRR Serbia
Kyoko Postill, DRR Uzbekistan
 

 




Social Enterprise: A new model for poverty reduction and employment generation

This report finds that traditional development initiatives in post-communist states often focus on bolstering the private sector or the state, while ignoring organizations that combine for-profit activities with social aims.  It covers 12 post-communist countries and includes three in-depth sections devoted to the social enterprise phenomenon in Poland, Serbia and Ukraine. It suggests a number of ways to promote social enterprises in transition countries, including efforts to make the legal and political environments more favourable, holding outreach and advocacy initiatives that engage decision makers and the public, setting up agencies specifically designed to support social enterprises, and providing ‘seed money’ and small grants aiming to sustain social enterprises.




Environmental Policy in South-Eastern Europe

The purpose of the Environmental Policy in South-Eastern Europe report is to provide an overview of the progress towards the development and implementation of environmental and sustainability policy in South-Eastern Europe. It has been prepared for the Belgrade Ministerial Conference in 2007. Its scope is to help the Environment Ministers and other decision makers in South-Eastern Europe, the EU, donor countries, international organisations and other interested parties in their decision making about their future work in the areas covered by the Report.

The Report tries to provide a picture of progress achieved in recent years across this broad range of issues. The selection of topics covered by the Report was made by representatives of UNDP Country Offices in consultation with country focal points at the Regional Workshop on September 14 and 15, 2006. It is based on the scope of the reference framework as well as the policy development and implementation situation in the region. The Report does not include individual country profiles, as they have already been presented in the report “Environmental Snapshot of South-Eastern Europe: REReP Country Profiles” published by the REC in 2006.




At Risk: Roma and the Displaced in Southeast Europe

This report presents for the first time a wealth of survey data on the situation of Roma, refugees and IDPs in Albania, Bosnia & Herzegovina (BiH), Bulgaria, Croatia, FYR Macedonia, Montenegro, Romania, and Serbia, including the UN-administered province of Kosovo. It offers a comprehensive and statistically rich picture of the problems vulnerable groups face in the region – and puts forward pragmatic, concrete policy advice on what governments, the international community and representatives of vulnerable groups themselves can do to break this vicious cycle of poverty and exclusion.


Administrative Capacity Building in Prospective and New EU Member States. Reference Guide for Horizontal Integration

This guide aims to help improve co-ordination and efficiency in policy making and implementation at the central governmental level in the new and prospective member states of the European Union. It is primarily intended for use by advisors/trainers of public administration decision- and policymakers. This publication was produced with support from the Matra Programme (Netherlands), under UNDP project RER99/003, Building Advisory Capacities in Central and Eastern European States.




Poverty Reduction in Serbia: The Role of Civil Society

Produced by UNDP Serbia and Montenegro in cooperation with the Civil Society Advisory Committee (CSAC), this report aims to strengthen the role of the third sector in poverty reduction. Through case studies it presents the priorities for poverty reduction in Serbia and demonstrates how civil society organizations can engage more assertively in poverty reduction initiatives.


Fiscal Decentralization in Transition Economies: Case Studies from the Balkans and Caucasus

This study, based on research conducted by Georgia State University’s Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, assesses the current status of fiscal decentralization in Armenia, Croatia, Georgia, FYR Macedonia, and Serbia and Montenegro, and contains valuable lessons for many countries of the region. It recommends policy and institutional changes for the consideration of these governments as they seek to find the right mix of central and local governance, as well as state and private enterprise, in navigating the challenges of transition. 


Faces of Poverty, Faces of Hope

Poverty pockets and excluded, marginalized groups exist throughout Europe, depriving whole communities of equal participation in development. The rate of transition in Central and Southeastern Europe varies widely among different socio-economic groups, with some vulnerable populations, such as the Roma, in danger of being left behind. The primary purpose of this publication is to provide quantitative and comparable data on development problems and challenges of vulnerable groups in general, and Roma in particular, in Central and Southeastern Europe.


How to Build Open Information Societies

A collection of best practices and know-how. This publication contains knowledge-based best practices accumulated by UNDP in Europe and the CIS and shows how ICT can promote socio-economic development and good governance. The articles collected here give readers a glimpse of the powerful transformative force ICT can be when deployed wisely. ICT offers the leapfrogging development potential that less developed countries can use to build modern, competitive, mobile, versatile, and ultimately democratic societies – open information societies for all their citizens.

The report can be downloaded in its entirety, or by country article.


Environmental Governance Sourcebook

This publication, which seeks to provide basic substantive knowledge fundamental to improving environmental governance, has been prepared primarily for countries with economies in transition. It describes the linkages between the environment and other fields of the development process (economy, health, human development and standard of living, as well as security), and to bring the reader up to date on global, regional, and sub-regional environmental problems. It further explains international environmental policy framework and standard instruments for implementing environmental policy at the national and sub-national levels. Last but not least, the publication provides a review of various sources of international assistance in addressing environmental issues.




The Inflexibility Trap

The Inflexibility Trap, which synthesizes the main conclusions of the first year of work of civil society initiative Blue Bird, provides recommendations for building effective interaction between government and civil society in the policy process in the context of Southeastern Europe.